Nature

There are close connections between scientific claims about the contemporary world and wider shifts in the terms of societal discourse. As history demonstrates time and again, scientists change our actualité not only through their technological inventions but also through the vocabularies and methods they employ to persuade those outside science to pay attention. Consequently, when Time magazine recently informed its many readers that “[n]ature is over”—one of “[t]en ideas that are changing your life”—it came as no surprise to discover science as its inspiration. In his article, Time journalist Bryan Walsh pointed to the idea—first advanced by Nobel Prize–winning atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen and freshwater biologist Eugene Stoermer (2000)—that we now live in “the Anthropocene.” But he could just as easily have referenced the research of laboratory scientists, such as the world-famous geneticist Craig Venter (2013). Where Crutzen and Stoermer suggested that the supposed ontological divide between humans and nonhumans …

This essay may be found on page 151 of the printed volume.

Works Cited
Permanent Link to this Essay