An exploration of the keyword “riot” reveals a phenomenon that grapples with the nexus of race, class, violence, space, power, and resistance. Attempts to define “riot” are often overtaken by efforts to scapegoat people at the center of a given confrontation. Frequently, the dominant question bandied about by popular media after a riot is “why are they destroying their own communities?” This question typifies much of the fuzzy thinking related to defining a riot—­a focus on the reactions of aggrieved communities, rather than the dynamics that provide the backdrop for the disruption itself. An analysis of the term points the way toward a clearer definition, one grounded in historical context and responsive to new theoretical interventions.

This essay may be found on page 179 of the printed volume.

Works Cited
Permanent Link to this Essay